Safe Work Method Statements for High-Risk Construction Work in the ACT
WHS Regulation 2011 (ACT) reg 299 requires a SWMS before high-risk construction work. Reg 291 defines the 18 categories. $250,000 construction project trigger.
What it is
The ACT requires a Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS) to be prepared before any high-risk construction work commences under regulation 299 of the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (ACT). Regulation 291 defines the 18 categories aligned with the model WHS Regulation.
WorkSafe ACT within Access Canberra enforces the framework. The 19 November 2025 notifiable incident rewrite and the dual industrial manslaughter framework (WHS Act s 34C and Crimes Act s 15) both interact with SWMS compliance.
Categories align with model WHS
ACT regulation 291 lists the same 18 categories as NSW, QLD, WA, SA, TAS and NT. Work at heights above 2 metres, asbestos disturbance, confined space, deep excavation and 14 other categories.
When a SWMS is required
Regulation 299 requires the SWMS to be prepared BEFORE the high-risk construction work commences.
SWMS content, review and principal contractor duties
Regulation 299 requires identification of the type of work, hazards, controls and implementation. Regulation 300 requires review on method change, control inadequacy or notifiable incident. Regulation 309 requires the principal contractor to obtain SWMS from each contractor.
Construction project trigger at $250,000
The WHS Regulation 2011 (ACT) construction project value trigger sits at $250,000, aligned with Tasmania. Above the threshold, principal contractor duties attach.
Penalties
Regulation 299 offence carries penalties in line with the model WHS Regulation.
Interaction with dual industrial manslaughter framework
SWMS failures that cause a workplace death can be prosecuted under either section 34C of the WHS Act 2011 (ACT) or section 15 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT). ACT prosecutors treat inadequate SWMS as evidence of negligence under either pathway.
Interaction with COL Act licensing
WHS Act SWMS breaches by an ACT construction occupations licensee can trigger Construction Occupations Registrar disciplinary action under Part 5 of the COL Act 2004 (ACT). Access Canberra takes an integrated compliance approach.
Property Developers Act 2024 layer
For class 2 residential apartment projects, the Property Developers Act 2024 (ACT) framework can also engage where SWMS failures contribute to defective work requiring rectification orders. The Property Developers Act rectification orders commenced 11 July 2024.
How the ACT compares
ACT aligns with NSW, QLD, WA, SA, TAS and NT on the 18-category framework. Distinctive ACT features are:
- dual industrial manslaughter framework (WHS Act and Crimes Act pathways)
- integrated Access Canberra approach across WHS and COL Act licensing
- Property Developers Act 2024 layer for class 2 apartment projects
Citations
- [1]
Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (ACT), regulations 291, 299, 300 and 309
legislationACT Parliamentary Counsel · ACT · accessed 23/07/2026
Reg 291 18 categories of high-risk construction work. Reg 299 SWMS requirement. Reg 300 SWMS review. Reg 309 principal contractor SWMS aggregation. $250,000 construction project value threshold.
- [2]
Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (ACT), section 34C and Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), section 15
legislationACT Parliamentary Counsel · ACT · accessed 23/07/2026
Section 34C WHS Act industrial manslaughter and section 15 Crimes Act industrial manslaughter operate in parallel in the ACT. SWMS failures causing a workplace death can be prosecuted under either pathway.
- [3]
Construction Occupations (Licensing) Act 2004 (ACT) and Property Developers Act 2024 (ACT)
legislationACT Parliamentary Counsel · ACT · accessed 23/07/2026
COL Act 2004 (ACT) Part 5 disciplinary framework and Property Developers Act 2024 (ACT) rectification order framework (from 11 July 2024). Both interact with WHS Act enforcement for construction industry SWMS breaches.
How this was researched
This entry was drafted from primary Australian sources (legislation, regulator publications and industry guidance) and reviewed and signed off by Hunter Jacobs, Director, TradeForm. Citations link to the source documents you can verify yourself. The entry is re-verified on a cadence and automatically flagged for review when a watched source changes.
Disclaimer
This is general information about Australian construction and business topics. It is not legal, engineering, or financial advice. Laws and standards change. Verify current requirements with a licensed professional in your jurisdiction before relying on this content.