Skip to content
AU-wideBusiness operationsVerified 29 May 2026

Director Personal Liability in Residential Construction: When the Corporate Veil Lifts

When directors of an Australian residential building company become personally liable: insolvent trading under s 588G, ATO director penalty notices and WHS personal duties.

What it is

A company is a separate legal person, so directors usually carry no personal debt for the company they run. That shield breaks in three places that matter for residential builders: insolvent trading under the Corporations Act, director penalty notices issued by the ATO for unpaid tax obligations and personal duties under work health and safety law. Each pathway has its own trigger, defence and consequence, and a builder facing trouble can sit inside all three at once.

This entry walks each one in turn. The aim is not legal advice. The aim is to give a builder or homeowner a clear map of where the corporate veil actually lifts so they can read warning signs and ask the right questions.

Insolvent trading: section 588G

Section 588G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) makes a director personally liable for company debts incurred at a time when the company was insolvent or became insolvent because of incurring the debt, if the director was aware or a reasonable director would have been aware of the insolvency. The director must have failed to prevent the company from incurring the debt.

Insolvent means unable to pay debts as they fall due. Cash flow is the test, not the balance sheet. A residential builder who is still issuing progress claims, still ordering materials and still signing new HIA or Master Builders contracts while suppliers go unpaid for 60 or 90 days is operating in the danger zone for s 588G.

Who can sue

A liquidator can sue the director on behalf of creditors. ASIC can pursue civil penalties. A creditor can also sue with leave or where the liquidator does not act. Damages equal the loss suffered by the creditor that was caused by the insolvent trading.

Safe harbour

Section 588GA provides a safe harbour. A director who develops or implements one or more courses of action that are reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company than immediate administration is protected for debts incurred in connection with that course of action. Engaging an appropriately qualified restructuring adviser, keeping financial records current and paying employee entitlements and tax obligations are conditions of staying inside safe harbour.

ATO director penalty notice

Division 269 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) lets the ATO issue a director penalty notice. The penalty equals unpaid PAYG withholding, GST and superannuation guarantee charge that the company has not remitted.

There are two flavours. A standard DPN gives the director 21 days from the date of the notice to pay the debt, place the company into administration or appoint a small business restructuring practitioner or liquidator. A lockdown DPN applies where the company failed to lodge the relevant business activity statement within three months of its due date or the SGC statement within one month after its due date. A lockdown DPN does not give the 21-day option. The director is liable from the day the notice issues.

The ATO posts the DPN to the director's address on the ASIC register. Time runs from posting, not from receipt. A director who has moved house without updating ASIC has already lost days. This is one of the cleanest reasons to keep ASIC particulars current.

Defences

Section 269-35 lists defences. Illness preventing involvement in management, taking all reasonable steps to cause the company to pay or to enter administration and reasonable mistake on the SGC calculation are the recognised grounds. These defences are narrow in practice.

Work health and safety personal duties

Under the model Work Health and Safety Act, an officer of a person conducting a business or undertaking has a duty to exercise due diligence to ensure the PCBU complies with its WHS duties. Section 27 of the model Act creates this officer duty, and a breach is prosecuted personally.

Due diligence includes acquiring up-to-date knowledge of WHS matters, understanding the hazards and risks of the construction work, ensuring the PCBU has and uses appropriate resources and processes, and verifying that systems are working. Category 1 offences for reckless conduct exposing a person to risk of death or serious injury carry imprisonment terms for individuals and large fines.

For a residential builder, the practical pinch points are falls from heights, electrical work and asbestos plus live-traffic interface on the street. A director who has signed off on a site management plan that has not been followed, then a worker is seriously injured, is the named officer in a SafeWork prosecution.

Other personal exposure

Three additional areas catch directors out.

First, personal guarantees. Most trade suppliers and subcontractors require a director guarantee on the credit account. A liquidation does not extinguish the guarantee. The supplier sues the director directly.

Second, statutory trust regimes. NSW and Queensland have project trust account rules that require head contract progress payments to be held on trust for subcontractors on residential work above a threshold. Misuse of trust monies attracts personal liability and criminal penalty.

Third, the Director Identification Number scheme run by Australian Business Registry Services since 1 November 2021 means every director has a permanent 15-digit ID. The DIN makes it harder for directors of failed builders to disappear and reappear with new companies, and helps the ATO and ASIC trace serial offenders.

Reading the situation as a homeowner or subbie

A homeowner who is owed money by a building company and a subcontractor on an unpaid invoice have one shared question: is there a director worth chasing personally. The answer turns on whether one of these triggers has fired. A liquidator will run the s 588G case if there is a recovery to be had. The ATO will run its own DPN process. WHS prosecutions are separate. Each lane runs in parallel, and a creditor sometimes benefits indirectly when the liquidator's recovery from the director funds a dividend.

The takeaway is practical. Directors are not untouchable in residential construction. The corporate veil is a real thing, but the holes in it are well mapped.

Citations

  1. [1]

    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 588G Director duty to prevent insolvent trading

    legislationFederal Register of Legislation · accessed 28/05/2026

    Section imposes a duty on directors to prevent the company from incurring a debt when the company is insolvent or would become insolvent by incurring that debt, and imposes personal liability for breach.

  2. [2]

    Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Schedule 1 Division 269 Director Penalty regime

    legislationFederal Register of Legislation · accessed 28/05/2026

    Division 269 sets the director penalty regime including standard and lockdown notices for unpaid PAYG withholding, GST and superannuation guarantee charge.

  3. [3]

    Model Work Health and Safety Act s 27 Officer duty of due diligence

    legislationSafe Work Australia · accessed 28/05/2026

    Officer of a PCBU must exercise due diligence to ensure the PCBU complies with its WHS duties.

  4. [4]

    Director penalties: guidance for company directors

    governmentAustralian Taxation Office · accessed 28/05/2026

    Practical ATO guidance on when DPNs issue, the 21-day rule and lockdown variants.

  5. [5]

    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 588GA Safe harbour for insolvent trading

    legislationAustLII · accessed 28/05/2026

    Director is not liable for insolvent trading for debts incurred in connection with a course of action that is reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome than immediate administration.

  6. [6]

    Director identification number requirements

    governmentAustralian Securities and Investments Commission · accessed 28/05/2026

    ASIC guidance on the Director Identification Number scheme requirements for directors of Australian companies.


How this was researched

This entry was drafted from primary Australian sources (legislation, regulator publications and industry guidance) and reviewed and signed off by Hunter Jacobs, Director, TradeForm. Citations link to the source documents you can verify yourself. The entry is re-verified on a cadence and automatically flagged for review when a watched source changes.

Disclaimer

This is general information about Australian construction and business topics. It is not legal, engineering, or financial advice. Laws and standards change. Verify current requirements with a licensed professional in your jurisdiction before relying on this content.